On May 24, after more than 12 hours of debate, the House Agriculture Committee passed the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2024 (H.R. 8467), a.k.a. farm bill, with a 33-21 vote. All 29 Republican members of the committee and four Democrats voted for it. Partisanship played into debates over spending priorities and the Nutrition Title. The draft bill includes an increase in reference prices (canola from $20.15/cwt to $23.75), chance to add base acres and crop insurance incentives. It also increases the Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) guarantee to 90 percent of the benchmark revenue (currently 86 percent) and the maximum ARC payment to 12.5 percent of the ARC revenue (currently 10 percent). Democratic amendments pertaining to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and climate-smart agriculture conservation funding were defeated. The U.S. Canola Association (USCA) and other farm groups applauded the House’s draft farm bill, writing to Thompson that numerous provisions “are responsive to the needs and requests” presented to him and his staff over the past 17 months. Read more about the bill’s attributes in a USCA Blog post by Executive Director Tom Hance.
A farm bill amendment of interest to winter canola was offered but withdrawn from Rep. Sharice Davids (D-KS) to make winter wheat eligible and counted as a “cover crop” for U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service programs. The existing cover crops definition and eligibility excludes harvested crops. House Agriculture Committee Chair Glenn Thompson indicated a willingness to work with Rep. Davids on this issue. The USCA will do so as well.
It is unclear when or if the farm bill will be considered on the House floor. Chair Thompson indicated it would be September at the earliest. Meanwhile, Senate Agriculture Committee Ranking Member John Boozman (R-AR) is expected to release his farm bill proposal in early June. This will hopefully lead to negotiations with Chair Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) on a version that can achieve the bipartisan support needed to clear the Senate.
The USCA was among 32 agricultural groups that submitted a letter to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), urging the agency to add Drift Reduction Adjuvants (DRAs) to the list of mitigation options available to pesticide users for Endangered Species Act (ESA) compliance. The letter noted that the EPA is moving quickly to implement ESA-related proposals and pesticide users need as many effective, practicable and affordable options as possible to meet ESA obligations. “We strongly urge EPA to add to the approved mitigation list DRAs and other adjuvants that can be effective in reducing off-target pesticide movement while providing pesticide users a practical compliance option,” the groups wrote.
The EPA held an ESA-FIFRA Mitigation Workshop on May 9, which included several presentations on how the proposed mitigations would impact growers in different regions. The agency indicated it “heard a strong interest in incorporating existing state, local, and other voluntary conservation programs into the final Herbicide Strategy Framework for runoff and erosion mitigation.” The EPA also recognized the need for stakeholder support – including education and training, financial, and technical assistance to effectively implement the proposed mitigation strategies – and to simplify the implementation process for growers. The final Herbicide Strategy Framework will be released by Aug. 30. It will help inform a draft insecticide strategy that will be issued for public comment by July 30.
In response to President Biden’s Executive Order 14081, “Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy,” the USDA, EPA and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) developed a plan to update, streamline and clarify their regulations and oversight mechanisms for products of biotechnology. The plan helps meet the president’s goals of ensuring public confidence in the biotech regulatory system and improving its transparency, predictability, coordination and efficiency. It incorporates processes and timelines to implement regulatory reform and to identify the potential need for new guidance. Biotech product regulation pertains to modified plants, animals and micro-organisms; human drugs, biologics and medical devices; and cross-cutting issues. The Executive Order directs the USDA, EPA and FDA to improve how they implement The Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology updated in May 2024. The agencies, in consultation with the Office of Science and Technology Policy, solicited and received 88 public comments on how to improve the framework, including a sign-on letter from 6,000+ members from biotech stakeholders.